The first book I read for my first class in university was Mircea Eliade’s The Sacred and the Profane.  The most important part of that book for me was the word ontology.  Not just what it means, but the fact that I read the first sentence and simply had no idea what it was talking about.  This was largely due to the presence of the word ontology.  For a seventeen-year-old who thought she had an excellent vocabulary, this was a salutary obstacle.

I came across the word again this last week in Madeleine L’Engle’s A Circle of Quiet.  The period she describes is the summer she learned, and focussed on, ontology.

Let me see if I can explain it.  Ontology is the study of being: the logos of ontaOnta is the Greek present participle of one of the words for ‘to be’, thus corresponding to the English ‘being’.  Logos is a notoriously difficult word to translate, and means something like study, reason, reasoning, order, word.  The Word is how logos is translated in the Gospel of John; ratio is how it is usually given in Latin texts.  It is about the inner ordering of things, and the spoken order that corresponds to that underlying order.

Ontology.  The reason of being, the rationale of being, the word of being.  Even without getting too far into the complexities of being (in Greek or in English), the ology part of it indicates something of the problem.  This isn’t just the study of life (biology) or even of truth (epistemology); this is the study of the thing that is, or the things that are; of what is.  It’s hard to talk about without being mystical, mystifying, or, I suspect, mistaken.

I’m only an amateur philosopher, so I can’t go too much farther than here at the moment, I’m afraid.  For most ancient philosophers the question was about where reality lies: usually in relation to God, or indeed in relation to the relationship between the divine and the human.  The divine is what is; the human, what only comes to be.

We  are not fully real, says Parmenides, a statement that at first sounds absurd — of course we exist! We’re here thinking, aren’t we? (Cue vague thoughts about Descartes.)  But yet there do seem to be degrees of reality, distinct ontological states, even if it’s very hard to distinguish them.  Some things seem to make us more real, deepen our onta.*  Others dilute it, make us feel thinner, scraped like Bilbo Baggins, as too little butter over too much toast.

Ontology.  The question of what is existence; one of the questions of questions.  Part of the tools of thought, even if I don’t know how to use the stranger items in the box.  I usually start questioning the ontological state of fictional characters, but that’s a question, I think, for another day.


* Yes, I know there are grammatical barbarisms in this.  On is ambiguous in Roman letters.


3 thoughts on “Ontology

  1. Absolutely brilliant! I know have something of substances to occupy my thoughts over the upcoming break.

    Incidentally, I must research this concept (with which I was previously unfamiliar) and how it relates to symptoms associated with various mental illnesses- symptoms which characterize a “breaking with reality”, such as a psychosis.

    Really the applicability of ontology as it relates to other disciplines is limitless! I’m so excited!!


  2. Well, it would be something *of* substances as well, in the “concerning” sense of the word “of” . . . but probably that’s too geeky a pun even for me to be sure it works!

    I read a very interesting book in the summer called “A Mood Apart,” about depression and bipolar disorders. One of the things I liked about it was that the author (a clinical and university psychiatrist –I think, I always get the terms wrong, I’m afraid; at any rate, he was drawing on both research and experience) brought in some philosophical concepts as well as the scientific theories and his observations. One of the case studies was on a Jesuit medievalist, which brought in the whole question of how sloth (as a technical term for the sin) related to depression (as a clinical disease).


Join the Conversation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s